Skip to content

Contact Information

David W. Agler
The Pennsylvania State University
Philosophy Department
242 Sparks Building
University Park, PA 16802
Penn State Faculty Profile

Positions

  1. 2024--. Associate Teaching Professor of Philosophy, Penn State.
  2. 2014--. Teaching \& Learning with Technology Coordinator, Penn State.
  3. 2012--2024. Assistant Teaching Professor of Philosophy, Penn State.
  4. 2007--2007. Lecturer in Philosophy, Indiana University--Purdue University Indianapolis, IUPUI.

Education

  1. 2007--2012. Ph.D. in Philosophy, Penn State, University Park, PA. Dissertation: Pragmatic Minimalism: A Defense of Formal Semantics. Committee: Vincent Colapietro (co-chair), Emily Grosholz (co-chair), Christopher Long, and Linda Selzer.
  2. 2004--2010. M.A. in American Philosophy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN. Thesis title: Vagueness and Its Boundaries: A Peircean Theory of Vagueness. Committee: Cornelis de Waal (chair), André De Tienne, and Nathan Houser.
  3. 2001--2004. B.A. in Philosophy, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN.
  4. 2001--2004. B.A. in English, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN.

Research and Teaching Interests

Classical American Philosophy (esp. Peirce, Royce), Philosophy of Language, Symbolic Logic, Metaphysics (esp. temporal ontology), Critiques of Wellness.

Books

  1. Agler, D. W. (2013). Symbolic Logic: Syntax, semantics, proof. Lanham: Rowman \& Littlefield.

Articles

  1. Agler, D. W. (2023). Reflections on Guide to Personal Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 49(2), 11-17.
  2. Stango, M. \& Agler, D. W. (2017). Human body, enhancement, and the missing technomoral virtue. Sociología y tecnociencia, 8(1), 43--59.
  3. Pollock, R. \& Agler, D. W. (2016). Hume and Peirce on the ultimate stability of belief. The Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97(2), 245--269.
  4. Agler, D. W. \& Stango, M. (2015). W. T. Harris, Peirce, and the charge of nominalism. Hegel Bulletin, 36(2), 135--158.
  5. Agler, D. W. (2014). Emergence from within and without: Juarrero on Polanyi's account of the external origin of emergence. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 40(3), 23--35.
  6. Agler, D. W. (2013). Peirce and the specification of borderline vagueness. Semiotica, 193, 195--215.
  7. Agler, D. W. (2013). What engineers can do but physicists can't: Polanyi and Margitay on machines. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 39(2), 22--26.
  8. Agler, D. W. \& Durmuş, D. (2013). Christine Ladd-Franklin: Pragmatist feminist. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 49(3), 299--321.
  9. Agler, D. W. (2012). Polanyi and Peirce on the Critical Method. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 38(3), 13--30.
  10. Agler, D. W. (2011). Peirce's direct, non-reductive contextual theory of names. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 46(4), 611--640.
  11. Agler, D. W. (2010). The UFAIL approach: unconventional weapons and their ‘unintended' medical effects. Bulletin of Science, Technology \& Society, 30(2), 103--112.
  12. Agler, D. W. (2006). The role of replication in the growth of symbols. In T. J. Prewitt \& B. Smith (Eds.), Semiotics 2006, 101--112.
  13. Agler, D. W. (2006). The symbolic self (o eu simbólico). Cognitio-Estudos: Revista Electrônica de Filosofia, 3(1), 1--9.

Reviews and Other Writings

  1. Agler, D. W. (2019). Review of Pragmatism and Vagueness: The Venetian Lectures; Edited by Giovanni Tuzet by Claudine Tiercelin. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 55(4), 458-463.
  2. Agler, D. W. (2013). Hitchcock, Ethan Allen. In J. R. Shook \& C. de Waal (Eds.), The Dictionary of Early American Philosophers. 500 words. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.
  3. Agler, D. W. (2013). What are the Most Important Things to Know? Philosophy Now, 94.
  4. Agler, D. W. (2012). Review of Robert B. Brandom, Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 38(3), 69--71.
  5. Agler, D. W. (2011). Review of Alice Crary, Beyond Moral Judgment. The Pluralist, 6(2), 103--110.
  6. Agler, D. W. (2011). Review of Laura E. Weed, The Structure of Thinking: A Process-oriented Account of Mind. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 38(1), 66--69.
  7. Agler, D. W. (2010). Book notice for Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition (1890--1892). The Reasoner, 4(6), 93.

Talks

  1. Agler, D. W. (2021). Disjunction and Biconditional Derivation Rules in Propositional Logic. John Carroll University. 11 Nov 2021.
  2. Agler, D. W. (2021). Disjunction and Biconditional Derivation Rules in Propositional Logic. John Carroll University. 13 April 2021.
  3. Agler, D. W. (2020). Derived Rules in Propositional Logic Proofs. John Carroll University. 17 Nov 2020.
  4. Agler, D. W. (2018). Reductionism in Mathematics and Psychology. Penn State. 26 Nov 2018.
  5. Agler, D. W. (2018). Logic and the Method of Science: Hypothetico-Deductivism, Falsification, and the Duhem-Quine Problem. Penn State. 10 Oct 2018.
  6. Agler, D. W. (2014). Two criticisms of the Cartesian maxim: Peirce's rejection of the method of doubt. The Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy. The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey. Galloway Township, NJ.
  7. Agler, D. W. (2014). Vagueness, language, and the problem of heaps: Peirce's dissolution of the Sorites paradox. The Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy. Denver, CO.
  8. Agler, D. W. (2012a). Peirce's critiques of the Cartesian maxim. The West Virginia Philosophical Society. Westminster College. New Wilmington, PA.
  9. Agler, D. W. (2011). Comments on Christopher Gibilisco's “David Lewis and Contingent Second-order Predication”. 10 sept. 2011. Pittsburgh Area Philosophy Colloquium. Washington and Jefferson College
  10. Agler, D. W. (2011). Modularity and minimalism. Pittsburgh Area Philosophy Colloquium. Washington and Jefferson College. Washington, PA.
  11. Agler, D. W. (2010). Peirce and Polanyi on doubt. Polanyi Society Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA.
  12. Agler, D. W. (2006a). Comments on Albert Spencer's “Am I My Brother's Keeper? Royce and Dewey on the Community's Responsibility for the Lost Individual. The 6th Annual Donald G. Wester Conference: Josiah Royce on Ethics and Community. Oklahoma City, OK. 8 April, 2006.
  13. Agler, D. W. (2006). The role of replication in the growth of symbols. 31st Annual Meeting of the Semiotic Society of America. Purdue University. West Lafayette, IN.
  14. Agler, D. W. (2005). The symbolic self. 8th International Meeting on Pragmatism. Pontifical Catholic University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  15. Agler, D. W. (2005b). The symbolic self. The Institute for American Thought. Indianapolis, IN.

Programs

  1. Agler, D. W. (2025). qti2txt: Convert Canvas quizzes to plaintext files. Github. PyPI
  2. In Progress. Agler, D. W. (2025). Papergrader: Grade Markdown Papers from CANVAS. Github.
  3. In Progress. Agler, D. W. (2025). Examcreator: Create study guides, CANVAS quizzes, and \LaTeX\ exams from one source file. Github.
  4. Agler, D. W. (2024). Propositional Logic Syntax Checker and Truth Table Generator (Python).
  5. Agler, D. W. (2023). LightCV: A \LaTeX\ Class for Curriculum Vitae. Github. (This CV is made with LightCV).
  6. Agler, D. W. (2023). Proofpack: A \LaTeX\ Package for Typesetting Natural Deduction Proofs. Github.

Courses Taught

  1. PHIL 001 Introduction to Philosophy
  2. PHIL 003 Philosophy of Well-being
  3. PHIL 004 The Human Condition
  4. PHIL 010 Critical Thinking
  5. PHIL 012 Symbolic Logic
  6. PHIL 013 Philosophy of Nature and the Environment
  7. PHIL 083 Bioethics (First-Year Seminar)
  8. PHIL 101 American Philosophy
  9. PHIL 102 Existentialism and European Philosophy
  10. PHIL 103 Ethics
  11. PHIL 107 Philosophy of Technology
  12. PHIL 110 Philosophy of Science
  13. PHIL 123 Introduction to Media Ethics (First-Year Seminar)
  14. PHIL 125W Epistemology (Writing Intensive)
  15. PHIL 126W Metaphysics (Writing Intensive)
  16. PHIL137N Introduction to Philosophy Through Health and Sport.
  17. PHIL 205 American Philosophy
  18. PHIL 297 Philosophy of Sport
  19. PHIL 401 American Philosophy
  20. PHIL 426W Metaphysics (Writing Intensive)
  21. PHIL 512 Graduate Logic

Undergraduate Independent Studies

  1. Topics in Symbolic Logic -- Alex Grigas, John Ouligian, Gretha Dos Santos, Madison Phillips, Ishan Agrahar
  2. Legal Reasoning on the LSAT - Alexis Sharghi and Colton Storm Diego
  3. Vagueness and the Line-Drawing Fallacy -- Matthew Thompson
  4. Logics of Vagueness -- Seongtaeg Kang
  5. Logic and Logic Games -- Chloe DeOnna
  6. Modal Logic -- Michael Challis
  7. Classical American Pragmatism and Implicit Bias -- Nicholas Charles
  8. Decision theory and the holdout problem -- Megan Nuggihalli
  9. Computation and Complexity -- David Friedman and Andres De La Fuente
  10. Philosophy of Time -- Emily Dorshaw and John Michael Gurklis

Courses Designed

  1. PHIL010 - Critical Thinking (web). Over 600 pages of instructional content, developed online exams, practice quizzes, quizzes, discussion forum, instructor's manual, approximately 26 lightboard videos, and supplemental video tutorials.
  2. PHIL012 - Symbolic Logic (web). With Mark Fisher. Wrote content, developed online exams, quizzes, instructor's manual, approximately 50 logic videos, and technical video tutorials.
  3. PHIL137N -- Introduction to Philosophy Through Health and Sport. Inter-domain course that introduces students to philosophical ideas and contextualizes them in relation to the concepts of health, wellness, and sport.

Professional Service, Awards, Development, Certificates

Certificates

  1. Accessible Online Course Authoring Certificate - Penn State World Campus Online Faculty Development. Awarded: 2026.
  2. Provost Endorsement Program, Accessibility in Curriculum - Penn State. Awarded: 2025.
  3. Provost Endorsement Program, Provost Endorsement: TOP: Teaching Online Program Level 3 - Penn State. Awarded: 2024.
  4. Harvard's CS50P: Introduction to Programming with Python. Certificate
  5. Online Course Authoring Certificate. Penn State World Campus Online Faculty Development. Awarded: 2023
  6. Foundations for Online Teaching Certificate. Penn State World Campus Online Faculty Development. Awarded: 2022
  7. Instructional Practice Certificate. Penn State World Campus Online Faculty Development. Awarded: 2020

Awards

  1. PSU Philosophy Department Joseph J. Kockelmans Award in Philosophy. Awarded 2012.
  2. Harold F. Martin Graduate Assistant Outstanding Teaching Award -- Penn State Graduate School and Office of the Vice President and Dean for Undergraduate Education. Awarded: 2011.
  3. Jean Martin Maxwell Prize for best M.A. Thesis containing a contribution to American Philosophy. Awarded: 2010.
  4. Graduate Fellowship. The Pennsylvania State University. Awarded: 2007-2012.
  5. IUPUI Summer Research Fellowship. The Peirce Edition Project. Awarded: 2006.
  6. IUPUI Research \& Graduate Fellowship. IUPUI Philosophy Department \& Peirce Edition Project. Awarded: 2005-2006.
  7. Co-winner of the IUPUI Philosophy Department Essay Competition, “The Symbolic Self”.

Student Evaluations (Qualitative)

  1. PHIL010 The handouts were much more efficient than other styles of teaching I have experienced. You could follow along without any confusion of where we were, and you never were behind in taking notes. Also, the demonstrations and visual representation of the topics on the chalk board made it much easier to follow along instead of just listening to lecture. It was also very helpful that we covered each topic in the same manner. The order of definition, to clarification, to examples, to creating your own examples consistently helped me learn. - SU2015
  2. PHIL010 Consistent teaching and class format, material was engaging and the course was the perfect balance of interesting material that the professor explained in a engaging and clear way, and an appropriate difficulty level to the point where the course was never too easy and boring and also never too stressful. -- Fall 2020
  3. PHIL012 Of all online courses I have taken at Penn State, professor Agler has been the most successful at teaching the course and providing ample resources to students, despite the difficult online platform. While the material is difficult to understand, Agler's textbook breaks down the information in a very helpful way. His online discussion board is an invaluable resource to students that find themselves having questions on the material. Even more so, Agler's response time (usually within a few hours) proves his dedication and true care for his students' success. While sometimes difficult to explain, he takes the time to write back to every student's question. He keeps his students alert of upcoming assignments (something that is easy to forget with an online course) by sending out regular emails. - SP2015
  4. PHIL012 Normally with online courses, I am nervous about the amount of contact I will be able to have with the professor. Professor Agler extends himself to all students and makes sure they are able to contact him and get further help on the course material. He provides continuous updates and is proactive with his students. - SP2015
  5. PHIL012 Dr. Agler was the most important aspect. I'm not really a math person and was a little bit apprehensive of a class that has many math elements to it, but Dr. Agler sets you up for success by giving you the tools you need to succeed: breakdowns of complex problems in class, detailed videos that he's made online, the textbook and packet which explain just about everything necessary, etc. Dr. Agler has set up the course in a way that if you want to succeed and you put the work in, you almost certainly will. You can tell he's very passionate about the subject by his willingness to help and go above and beyond for his students. He's also a genuinely good and funny guy, which helps him connect with the class and makes class entertaining - FA2021
  6. PHIL012 Agler was very realistic throughout the course regarding pace and content he was comfortable altering the schedule and material to accommodate the needs of the class. This allowed for extensive review and increased comprehension, especially with the more difficult content in the course. He has a great sense of humor and connected with the students on a level that most college professors are unable to achieve. As a student who ordinarily struggles with math-related classes, he provided an environment that allowed me to excel past my expectations. The youtube videos were also extremely helpful when we were initially learning about truth trees. Overall, interesting (but challenging) class and awesome professor. - FA2015
  7. PHIL012 The professor was very willing to help out students and re-word the explanations to better understand the concept. He would ALWAYS give real life examples to each new concept to help people understand at an easier level. He also found a tutor for students as well because this is known to be a relatively difficult course. He was an overall kind and understanding guy. - FA2015
  8. PHIL012 As we near the end of the course, I wanted to thank you for all of your generosity throughout the semester. In my [...] years at Penn State and [...] years of school prior, I have never had an educator more willing to help students learn. Online classes tend to be more challenging, and having you as a professor made this course significantly less stressful. I was challenged throughout the entire course, but was helped in a way that I actually learned concepts I will take with me. As I study for the LSAT, many techniques of logic learned in this course are extraordinarily helpful. You consistently helped me do my best throughout the course and you never made me feel stupid or like I was bothering you, even though I emailed you multiple times each week. Thank you for being such an outstanding professor, and your eagerness to help students is refreshing. I truly appreciate all of the additional help and encouragement you provided throughout the semester. - SP2017
  9. PHIL012 Professor Agler makes this class enjoyable. I dreaded taking this class but I can honestly say that I actually enjoyed it. Agler is a very personable guy and it makes a huge difference. Willing to help at anytime and clear up things that his students may be confused on. I would recommend Agler to anyone who has to take this course. -- Fall 2021
  10. PHIL012 David is enthusiastic about what and how he teaches material in class. He makes it interesting and easy to engage with. He provides good examples and can clearly break down complex topics so that we can more easily grasp the bigger picture. He also offers extra credit to encourage and emphasize the importance of practicing the material on our own. He is accommodating and understands that life can get in the way, and he is happy to reschedule exams or accept late work with little to no penalty. -- Fall 2021
  11. PHIL012 The homework that was due before each exam and the study guides we used before each exam helped me do well in the course. The professor was also very good at making sure you understood what was being and offered many opportunities to get additional help. The YouTube videos were also helpful. -- Fall 2021
  12. PHIL012 I love this course, and the professor. I consistently think about how well versed Dr. Agler is in these topics while learning about them in class. He truly cares about his students, and provides all the necessary tools in order to succeed in this course; for example practice exams, videos, definitions, textbooks, etc. Symbolic Logic is not easy to understand, however Dr. Agler's eloquence and care makes this course a piece of cake. He is intelligent, and is very well equipped in translating a (basically) foreign language \& all of it's intricacies within the span of 1 semester. He provides different perspectives for different students to ensure that everyone can understand the same topic in different ways. He is accommodating and understanding, responds to emails fast, and genuinely wants to work with students so that they can succeed. I truly cannot praise this professor enough. Honestly, it amazes me that a person can explain these topics so well in a logical order. I have absorbed the material of this course and have applied it to everyday use without thinking twice. If there is any way to promote him, please you should award it to him. - FA2023
  13. PHIL012 Dr. Agler provides possibly the best educational experience throughout Penn State. Emails are responded to within 2 days, Exams are always graded within 3 days, and Homework Assignments are graded the same day of submission. Dr. Agler delivers the quality that I expect when paying $2200-$4413 (depending on in state or out of state) USD for a 3 credit class. Compared to other classes from the engineering or IST departments, the educational product delivered is far superior. There is no TA/LAs, he meets with you directly during office hours and does not defer students to TA/LAs first. There is no use of GradeScope, and quizzes are designed to work well in canvas. Attendance is taken via paper, and not TopHat, which can be problematic. There has been no mis-grades or disputes on any of the grading, and all policies are clearly listed in the syllabus. Additionally, Dr. Agler provides clear instructions on exams and has no ambiguous questions. He provides ample advance notice for upcoming assignments, exams, quizzes, etc. Notices are provided in class and through email. There are also ample extra credit assignments that promote learning. Dr. Agler also promotes student opportunities such as the philosophy club and possible grants, without being asked first. This proactive approach shows genuine care for student well being and success. In summary, Dr. David Agler provides timely responses, direct grading and office hours, clear grading policy and course schedule, meaningful assignments and extra credit, clear articulation of all problems and requirements on exams, and proactively cares about student success. This class sets the bar in terms of educational experience for all other classes in PennState. - Fall 2024
  14. PHIL013 The instructor's enthusiasm and high energy, as well as the interesting material covered in the class made me look forward to coming to class. He did an excellent job explaining diffcult concepts through humorous examples. The instructor also did a great job challenging the students and encouraging them to think critically
  15. by posing very interesting questions. I also appreciated how eager the instructor was in hearing our feedback for the course and his willingness to implement the suggestions. - FA2014
  16. PHIL013 The teacher used many different ways to get his point across, which helped understand a lot of lessons. He used videos, drawings on the blackboard, lecture, and group thinking to get ideas across. Talking among a group made me learn the most because it helped to hear other people's interpretation of what was just being lectured. - FA2014
  17. PHIL123 Via email: My name is [redacted], and I was a student in your Leap Media Ethics course. I am emailing you to say thank you for making the most out of the summer course! I learned so much through it and I felt more prepared in my journalism classes this semester. Whenever I had a question about journalism, I would use your old slides and the textbook of the course. Your class truly helped me with my transition into college life, especially the leap activities. From those activities, I was able to form a list of organizations I wanted to be a part of and internship opportunities. I am currently a news anchor for Penn State Network Television and a digital content intern for Penn State Athletics. I wouldn't have been aware of all these opportunities without your help. Thank you so much for everything and I hope you had a great semester! -- Spring 2021
  18. PHIL123 David is an amazing teacher who loved to help the class understand every single topic. He clearly cares about his students which really allowed us to care about him and the course in return. -- Summer 2021
  19. PHIL123 The professor was wonderful. The learning environment was friendly, the course content was informational, and the communication was exceptional. Although I did not meet Mr. Agler in person, he seems like one of the kindest professors who cares about his students. It was obvious that he wanted us to be successful in his class-- he taught us so much, and he was always up for answering questions, whether it was through email or setting up a zoom. He seems to really love teaching, and his positive attitude is contagious! I'm glad I took his class, it was informational and enjoyable. I can't say enough positive things about him and his class! -- Summer 2019
  20. PHIL297 I'm going to use this space to express how much I liked David because there isn't one. David was awesome. I really enjoyed his lectures, the way he explained things, and his passion for the subjects. Great work! - FA2016
  21. PHIL205 Our professor really explained ideas thoroughly, used clear examples, and printed out note packets that helped us follow along. Overall, I learned a lot in this course and I really enjoyed it.
  22. PHIL205 The packets that were handed out during class made it easy to follow lectures and understand the important points within the class. I also loved the way the class assignments were organized because it made me prepare for the essay I had to write. Also, the assignments made sure I understood the material we were learning. -- Spring 2019
  23. PHIL205 Professor Agler made some conceptually challenging concepts very clear. He always had an example that made things make sense. He also has a very good sense of humor, and incorporates it as best he can with lectures. Also, I think he did a great job once we moved to remote learning; he clearly has some internet prowess. -- Spring 2019
  24. PHIL205 What helped me learn in this course was the thoroughness of Professor Agler's teaching. He made sure that everyone understood some difficult concepts without making the students incompetent. I had no prior knowledge to anything philosophy based and I feel that I have learned so much in this class. -- Spring 2020
  25. PHIL401 The lectures were thought out and organized, and the corresponding handouts made it much easier to navigate my own notes after class. I really appreciate the effort in organizing the material in these handouts and in the lectures themselves. The inclusion of some visual charts to communicate some relations between concepts was helpful. Also helpful was the instructor's activeness in sharing interesting and relevant materials besides the primary literature outside of class. -- Fall 2018